Sunday, Jan 25, 2026
Brooklyn, New York
The letter arrived in my inbox, forwarded with a simple note about ongoing discussions and a request for guidance. I opened the attachment and read what has become an all-too-familiar story: a property owner died intestate more than three decades ago, and the property remains titled in the deceased’s name. No one ever applied for a grant of Letters of Administration. The Transport was never updated. Multiple children, some living in Guyana, most scattered overseas across continents and time zones. The attorney’s letter outlined the legal requirements: eleven separate documents to be gathered, coordinated, and submitted. Death certificates, birth certificates, property valuations, consents from all heirs, and a retainer fee to begin the process. Then months of coordination with the Guyana Revenue Authority, the Probate section of the Supreme Court, and government offices across Georgetown. Only then could the property transfer from the deceased’s name to the heirs’ names, assuming all could agree on the disposition.
I read the letter twice, noting the attorney’s careful observation that “family-owned properties often end up with various issues” and the practical suggestion that one heir might “buy out” the remaining shares. The euphemism was transparent. What the attorney meant, but was too professional to state directly, was this: the family property is legally worthless until this matter is resolved, and, given more than 30 years of inaction, resolution seems unlikely.
As I finished reading, a single thought struck me with the force of mathematical proof: this is not one family’s problem. This is Guyana’s problem. And if we don’t solve it now, at the dawn of our oil wealth era, we will squander the greatest economic opportunity in our nation’s history.
We spend considerable ink in these pages analyzing Guyana’s oil contracts, debating the Natural Resource Fund’s investment strategy, and projecting GDP growth rates that would make any economist dizzy. The IMF reports that Guyana led the world with an average annual GDP growth rate of 47% from 2022 to 2024. President Ali speaks of a transformed nation, a “South American Dubai,” where oil wealth will lift all boats and establish Guyana as a regional powerhouse.
But here’s the uncomfortable mathematical truth: you cannot build generational wealth on an inheritance foundation that remains unresolved. You cannot leverage assets you cannot legally prove you own. You cannot transfer prosperity to your children when your parents’ estates remain in legal limbo decades after their deaths.
Guyana is attempting to construct a modern, middle-class economy while simultaneously ignoring a fundamental problem: we have forgotten how to die properly.
Let me present this as a mathematician would. Assume a modest scenario: a Guyanese family owns property valued at GYD 15 million, roughly USD 72,000. The grandmother who held title died in 1990 without a will. She had 8 children, now scattered across Georgetown, New York, Toronto, and London. Under Guyana’s intestacy laws, each child inherited a one-eighth share of the property. One sibling has occupied the house for 33 years. The others have been waiting for “the right time” to address the inheritance.
What is this property actually worth to the family? The answer is zero.
They cannot sell it without unanimous agreement from all 8 siblings—a Sisyphean task when siblings are spread across four countries, four time zones, and often four decades of accumulated family grievances. They cannot mortgage it. They cannot develop it. They cannot use it as collateral for business loans or educational financing. One sibling lives there rent-free while seven others hold worthless paper claims to one-eighth of an asset they can never monetize.
Now consider that many of these 8 siblings may have children of their own. As this second generation comes of age in our oil boom era—perhaps doctors, engineers, entrepreneurs returning to participate in Guyana’s transformation—they discover they’ve inherited not wealth, but legal quicksand. Their “asset” is an undocumented claim to a fractional share of a property they’ve never seen, in a title that’s been dead for three decades. This is not generational wealth. This is generational paralysis.
We don’t have comprehensive statistics—and that absence itself tells a damning story—but conversations with probate attorneys, real estate developers, and mortgage bankers paint a consistent picture. Across Guyana, thousands of properties remain titled in the names of deceased persons. Some grandparents who died before independence in 1966 still appear on property records. Their great-grandchildren, now adults in the oil economy, cannot access what should be their inheritance.
The Deeds Registry, operating under legislation dating to 1919, processes land transactions that can take 12 weeks even under ideal circumstances. But these are not ideal circumstances. Many families have never initiated probate proceedings. They’ve simply waited. Waited for what? For siblings to agree? For someone else to handle it? For the problem to somehow resolve itself?
Meanwhile, the opportunity cost compounds like unpaid interest. That locked property could have been sold to finance a child’s medical education. It could have been leveraged for a small business loan that might now be a thriving enterprise. It could have been developed into rental units, generating income for retirement. Instead, it sits—a monument to bureaucratic inertia and family dysfunction masquerading as an asset on someone’s mental balance sheet.
The problem intensifies when we consider Guyana’s demographic reality. Since the economic crises of the 1970s and 1980s, hundreds of thousands of Guyanese have emigrated. The World Bank estimates that Guyana has one of the highest emigration rates in the world relative to population. More Guyanese live abroad than at home.
This diaspora maintained connections to family land even as they built lives in Brooklyn, Brampton, and Brixton. Parents told children, “We still have the house in Georgetown. That’s yours one day.” Children grew up with a vague sense of property ownership in a country they barely remembered.
Then the parents died. Often without wills. Sometimes, without even telling their foreign-born children the details of the Guyana property. The younger generation discovers they’re beneficiaries of an estate they don’t know how to claim, in a legal system they don’t understand, requiring physical presence or Power of Attorney in a country where they have no current connections.
Attorneys who specialize in these cross-border disputes have documented cases of siblings in Guyana transferring property without their siblings’ consent—sometimes through forged documents, sometimes by exploiting the absent heirs’ ignorance of Guyana’s legal requirements. The diaspora sibling discovers years later that their inheritance was stolen. They may have legal recourse—even in U.S. courts under Long-Arm Statute provisions—but the cost of international litigation often exceeds the value of the disputed property.
The mathematics become perverse: it costs more to fight for your inheritance than the inheritance is worth, so families simply abandon their claims. Multiply this by thousands of families, and you have a massive transfer of wealth from the legitimate but absent heirs to whichever sibling happened to remain in Guyana and act opportunistically. This is not a legal system. This is a lottery where presence beats legitimacy.
Now overlay Guyana’s oil transformation onto this dysfunctional foundation. The government projects that oil revenues will generate USD 7.5 billion annually by 2040. The Natural Resource Fund already exceeds USD 2 billion. Infrastructure projects are underway. Silica City—a planned “smart city” for 60,000 people—represents the kind of ambitious development that requires land, capital, and legal clarity.
A new middle class is emerging. First-time homebuyers. Small business owners. Professionals earning oil-economy salaries. They’re accumulating wealth at a pace their parents never imagined. But if they follow their parents’ example—dying without wills, leaving property in legal limbo, expecting children to “work it out”—we’re simply scaling up the inheritance trap. We’re creating more valuable assets that will become equally useless to the next generation.
Worse, the oil wealth creates new complexities. Consider a Guyanese entrepreneur who builds a successful oil-services company valued at USD 5 million. She has three children: one in Guyana running the family business, one in Houston working for ExxonMobil, and one in Toronto practicing medicine. She dies suddenly without a will or succession plan.
Under Guyana’s intestacy laws, each child inherits one-third of the estate. But what does that mean operationally? Can the Houston engineer and Toronto doctor force liquidation of a going concern? Can the Georgetown sibling buy them out—and if so, at what valuation? If they can’t agree, does a thriving business get destroyed in probate court?
The oil boom is creating precisely the kind of complex estates—business interests, multiple properties, international assets—that most desperately need sophisticated planning. Yet we’re culturally unprepared for this reality. Many Guyanese still treat will-making as morbid, estate planning as something only for the wealthy, and family discussions about inheritance as taboo. This is not cultural preservation. This is cultural suicide.
To Guyana’s credit, Parliament has attempted some modernization. The Civil Law (Rights of Persons in Common Law Union) Act of 2012 granted inheritance rights to common-law spouses in relationships of five years or more. This was progressive legislation that rectified an injustice in which long-term partners could be excluded from estates.
But it also introduced new complexity. Consider a man who dies with both a legal wife and a common-law partner of six years. Both have legitimate claims under current law. He has children from both relationships. Without a will specifying his intentions, the estate must be divided among competing claimants—legal wife, common-law spouse, children from the first relationship, and children from the second relationship.
The mathematics alone become contentious: If the legal wife gets one-third and the common-law spouse gets one-third, do the children split the remaining one-third? Or does each group of children get one-third of two-thirds? And who decides which interpretation prevails? Again, these questions have legal answers. But obtaining those answers requires probate proceedings, attorney fees, valuations, and time. Meanwhile, the property sits in legal purgatory. The 2012 Act was good policy. But good policy without good execution is merely good intentions. And we know where roads paved with good intentions lead.
In 2024, Parliament amended the Deceased Persons Estate Administration Act to allow surviving spouses or heirs to access up to GYD 750,000 from financial institutions without obtaining full probate. Attorney General Anil Nandlall correctly noted that the previous limit—GYD 250, set nearly a century ago—had become absurdly inadequate. This reform will help. A widow can now access approximately USD 3,600 to cover immediate funeral expenses and short-term needs without enduring months of probate proceedings.
But here’s the paradox: the reform improves liquidity but does nothing to address the underlying title issues. That widow might be able to access GYD 750,000 from her husband’s bank account, but she still cannot sell the family house if it’s titled in her deceased father-in-law’s name from 1975. She still cannot mortgage it. She still cannot clear the title for her own children’s eventual inheritance. We’re treating symptoms while the disease metastasizes.
The actual probate process, even under the best circumstances, requires a death certificate, a comprehensive asset inventory, professional valuations, a declaration to the Guyana Revenue Authority, payment of 0.5% process fee, a court application with supporting affidavits, a personal appearance or a Power of Attorney, and a minimum of six to twelve weeks processing time. For a diaspora family coordinating across continents, this is daunting. For a working-class family in Georgetown, the attorney fees alone may seem prohibitive. So they wait. And wait. And wait.
Let me construct a simple model to illustrate the economic impact. Assume 25,000 properties in Guyana remain titled to deceased persons, a conservative estimate. Assume an average property value of GYD 10 million, or USD 48,000. Assume these properties have been in legal limbo for an average of 20 years. Assume a potential annual return of 5% if the property could be leveraged. The total locked capital amounts to GYD 250 billion, or USD 1.2 billion. The lost annual economic activity comes to GYD 12.5 billion, or USD 60 million. The cumulative 20-year opportunity cost reaches GYD 250 billion, or USD 1.2 billion.
In other words, we’ve essentially destroyed USD 1.2 billion in potential wealth—roughly equivalent to one year’s current oil revenues—through sheer legal inertia. But the actual cost is higher because this model doesn’t account for the multiplier effects of unleveraged capital, business opportunities not pursued, education not financed, medical care not accessed, entrepreneurship not attempted, and properties not maintained, which deteriorate. The inheritance gridlock isn’t just a legal inconvenience. It’s a massive destruction of economic value, happening silently, barely measured, largely ignored.
Why does this persist? Part of the answer lies in Guyana’s colonial legacy and subsequent political turmoil. The Deeds Registry system, rooted in 19th-century British colonial administration overlaid on Dutch Roman law foundations, was never designed for a modern, mobile, diaspora population. The Transportation Court procedures assume physical presence and local knowledge.
But culture also plays a role. Many Guyanese view will-making as inviting death—a superstition that would be charming if it weren’t so economically destructive. Others avoid the topic because it requires confronting difficult family dynamics: which child gets the house? How do we divide property fairly between children who stayed and children who left? What if one child contributed more to parents’ care?
These are hard conversations. I understand that. But here’s the harder truth: avoiding the conversation doesn’t make it go away. It simply defers the conflict to your children, who will have the same arguments—except now, in the emotionally fraught context of grief, with you not present to mediate, and with legal complexity you could have prevented.
There’s also a perverse incentive structure. The sibling occupying the family house has every reason to delay estate administration. Why initiate probate when doing so might require buying out siblings or selling the property? Better to maintain the status quo, living rent-free in perpetuity, and let sleeping legal dogs lie. Meanwhile, siblings abroad have high exit costs for pursuing their claims. Filing a probate action from Toronto requires hiring a Guyana attorney, obtaining valuations, possibly traveling for hearings, and managing proceedings from thousands of miles away. For a one-eighth share of a GYD 15 million property—perhaps USD 7,500 after legal fees—is it worth it? The rational economic actor says no. And that’s how wealth transfers from the many to the few through simple inaction.
The solutions are neither mysterious nor particularly innovative. They’re simply hard, and they require coordination across individual, professional, and governmental spheres. Every adult Guyanese should have a will. Period. Not “eventually.” Not “when I’m older.” Now. The requirements are straightforward: a written document signed by the testator and witnessed by two non-beneficiaries. You can accomplish this in an afternoon with an attorney, or even draft it yourself, though professional review is wise. The cost is minimal—often less than one month’s rent.
That will should clearly identify all property, name specific beneficiaries, appoint an executor (consider co-executors in different jurisdictions), explicitly address common-law relationships, provide for minor children, and include provisions for business succession, if applicable. For diaspora families, execute a Power of Attorney for someone in Guyana you trust absolutely—but structure it carefully with accountability mechanisms and specific powers rather than blanket authority. Most importantly: have the family conversation now. Tell your children where the documents are. Explain your reasoning. Give them the attorney’s contact information. Make it easy for them to execute your wishes.
Attorneys should offer estate planning clinics—perhaps pro bono or at reduced rates—to make these services accessible to people beyond the wealthy. The Guyana Bar Association could coordinate a national estate planning awareness campaign. Accountants and financial advisors should incorporate estate planning into standard wealth management discussions. When you’re helping a client invest oil-economy earnings, you should also ensure those investments can actually transfer to heirs. Real estate developers and mortgage bankers should require clear titles and refuse to perpetuate clouded ownership. Yes, this may reduce short-term transactions, but it improves long-term market integrity.
The government reforms needed are neither radical nor particularly expensive. Digitize the Deeds Registry. Moving from a paper-based system to digital records would improve efficiency, reduce fraud, and enable remote access. This is basic 21st-century governance. Expand the simplified probate threshold. If GYD 750,000 is now accessible without full probate, consider raising this to GYD 5 million for estates of minimal complexity. Most Guyanese estates fall below this threshold. Create an online probate filing system. Allow diaspora families to submit documents electronically, pay fees via international wire transfer, and track applications online. Why should a Toronto resident need to physically travel to Georgetown or execute a Power of Attorney for administrative paperwork?
Use oil revenues to fund a national public education campaign about the importance of will-making. Partner with churches, community organizations, and schools. Make estate planning a topic of public discussion rather than private shame. For low-income families, provide subsidized legal assistance for probate proceedings. The 0.5% process fee is manageable; the attorney fees often aren’t. Consider waiving process fees for estates older than 10 years, provided they are initiated within the next 2 years. Create a one-time “inheritance amnesty” to encourage families to clean up titles. Require sellers to prove a clear title going back at least one generation in property transactions. No more accepting transports from sellers who inherited property through undocumented intestacy.
None of this is technically difficult. It’s politically unglamorous—estate planning doesn’t make for exciting ribbon-cutting ceremonies—but the economic impact would dwarf most infrastructure projects.
Here’s the paradox that should motivate action: Guyana’s oil wealth creates both the problem and the solution. The problem is that rapid wealth accumulation without corresponding legal infrastructure creates tomorrow’s inheritance nightmares today. The solution is that oil revenues provide resources to fix the system before the next generation inherits our mistakes.
Right now, Guyana has money. The Natural Resource Fund is growing. The government has fiscal space for strategic investments. This is the moment to build a legal infrastructure that can handle complex, high-value estates. It’s also the moment for individual Guyanese to use oil-economy income wisely. Instead of rushing to buy the second property or the luxury car, perhaps the first investment should be in cleaning up family land titles, hiring an attorney to draft a will, and setting up proper estate structures.
The returning diaspora—professionals with U.S., Canadian, and U.K. salaries—should lead by example. You have the resources to hire good attorneys. You understand the importance of legal documentation from your experience abroad. You can model best practices for families still in Guyana.
And I think about the students I teach at Medgar Evers College, many of them children of Caribbean immigrants. They’re working-class kids, first-generation college students, striving for upward mobility in America. When I ask how many have family property “back home,” most hands go up. When I ask how many know the property’s legal status, the hands go down. They’re inheriting question marks, not assets. And unless something changes, they’ll pass the same question marks to their children.
This essay is written in advance of the Guyana Business Journal’s March webinar on estate planning and generational wealth. We’ll bring together legal experts, government representatives, and practitioners to provide concrete guidance on navigating these challenges. But I want to be clear about what a two-hour webinar can and cannot accomplish. It can provide information. It can answer questions. It can connect you with resources and professionals who can help. It cannot make you execute a will. It cannot force families to have difficult conversations. It cannot substitute for the individual responsibility each of us bears to plan properly. The webinar is a catalyst, not a solution. The solution requires your action.
So here’s my challenge to every reader. If you’re over 25 and don’t have a will, draft one in the next 30 days. If you’ve inherited property in a deceased relative’s name, initiate probate proceedings in the next 90 days. If you have siblings or co-heirs, schedule a family meeting in the next 60 days to discuss inherited property. If you’re a professional—attorney, accountant, financial advisor—commit to incorporating estate planning into your practice.
These aren’t aspirational goals. These are concrete, time-bound actions with measurable outcomes. And if 1,000 readers of this essay take these actions, we will have prevented roughly GYD 10-15 billion in future locked capital. That’s not my estimate—that’s basic mathematics based on average property values and typical family structures. One thousand families, properly planning now, can save Guyana approximately USD 50-75 million in future economic loss. That’s the power of compound interest working in our favor instead of against us.
Guyana stands at an inflection point. We have an opportunity—perhaps a once-in-history opportunity—to transform from a struggling post-colonial economy into a prosperous, modern state. But prosperity without planning is just temporary good fortune. Real generational wealth requires legal foundations, documented ownership, and clear succession pathways.
We cannot build skyscrapers on quicksand. We cannot create a middle-class economy on a foundation of unresolved inheritance. We cannot transfer oil wealth to future generations if we don’t know how to transfer the family house to our children. The inheritance gridlock is solvable. It’s not a natural disaster or an external threat. It’s a self-inflicted wound, and we have the tools to heal it. The question is whether we have the will.
Our grandparents built what they could with the limited resources of their era. They survived colonialism, political turmoil, economic collapse, and mass emigration. They held onto the land, often at great sacrifice, believing it would provide for their children and grandchildren. We dishonor their sacrifice when we let that land sit in legal limbo, unusable and un-leverageable, a monument to our own dysfunction and bureaucratic failure.
The oil is our windfall. But the land—that’s our inheritance. And inheritance, properly managed, compounds across generations in ways that even the most productive oil fields cannot match. Let’s not squander both.
Terrence Blackman is Publisher of the Guyana Business Journal and Professor and Chair of the Department of Mathematics at Medgar Evers College, CUNY. He holds a Ph.D. in Mathematics from the City University of New York and served as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Visiting Professor of Mathematics at MIT. The views expressed are his own.
The GBJ Webinar “Breaking the Inheritance Gridlock: Estate Planning for Guyana’s Oil-Rich Future” will be held in March 2026. Registration details at www.guyanabusinessjournal.com
📢 Please support the Guyana Business Journal & Magazine today
The Guyana Business Journal Editorial Board welcomes reflections and submissions at terrence.blackman@guyanabusinessjournal.com
Supported By
We are grateful for the partnership and support of individuals and organizations committed to advancing Guyanese and Caribbean development and human capital investment.
- Courtney Allen
- All Te Networks
- Corine Locke
- Tony Harris
- Roderick Alsopp
📢 Please support the Guyana Business Journal & Magazine today
