Guyana’s discovery of vast oil reserves has brought unprecedented economic opportunities, but it has also laid bare the complexities of income inequality rooted in both class and ethnicity. A recent study spanning 1990–2021 provides critical insights into these dynamics, demonstrating that class-based inequality significantly outweighs ethnic income disparities. However, the ethnic income gap remains pronounced in the top 10% of the population, where Indo- and Indigenous-Guyanese are disproportionately represented, while Afro- and Mixed-Guyanese are overrepresented in the bottom 90%. These findings underline the interwoven nature of class and ethnicity in Guyana’s socioeconomic landscape.
The research reveals that political transitions amplify these inequalities. For instance, after the electoral turnover in 2015, which temporarily displaced the predominantly Indo-Guyanese-supported People’s Progressive Party Civic (PPP/C), the dominance of Indo-Guyanese in the top income bracket increased. This underscores how fiscal policies and political power shifts can intensify existing divides. Interestingly, while the working poor across all ethnic groups remain largely unaffected by identity-based politics, the rivalry among elites for dominance within the top decile fuels inter-ethnic conflict.
The data challenges long-standing assumptions about the relationship between economic growth and inequality. Despite periods of growth, including the early 1990s reforms that increased public sector wages and improved conditions for the middle class, these gains were not evenly distributed. By 2017, the income share of the middle 40% had significantly declined, reflecting a reversal of earlier trends. Policies such as value-added taxes on essential services further exacerbated inequality, disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable populations.
Another critical takeaway is the role of fiscal policy in shaping income inequality. The study finds that fiscal interventions—such as progressive taxation and public sector wage increases—had a greater impact on reducing inequality than monetary policies or structural reforms. This insight is particularly relevant as Guyana navigates its oil wealth. If harnessed effectively, fiscal policy could mitigate class-based inequality and promote inclusive growth.
What emerges is a stark picture of representational inequality: while the poorest 50% of the population collectively earned just 25% of household income between 2006 and 2021, the top 10%—dominated by Indo-Guyanese—captured a far larger share. This reality complicates the narrative of identity-based politics, as it suggests that ethnicity is often wielded as a tool to advance intra-class competition rather than address the needs of the working class.
The study’s findings align with global research on inequality in developing nations, from South Africa to Malaysia. For instance, Malaysia’s experience demonstrates that reductions in class inequality can coincide with widening ethnic income gaps, a paradox evident in Guyana after 2015. These parallels underscore the importance of addressing inequality in a holistic manner, considering both class and ethnic dimensions.
As Guyana prepares for the upcoming presidential election in 2025, this research serves as a timely reminder of the challenges and opportunities ahead. The oil boom presents a chance to reshape Guyana’s socioeconomic landscape, but only if policies prioritize equitable growth and move beyond identity-driven divisions. Leaders must address the structural factors perpetuating inequality, including reforms in taxation, education, and labor markets.
The interplay between class and ethnic inequality in Guyana is a complex but critical issue that demands urgent attention. As the country grapples with the implications of its newfound wealth, policymakers, business leaders, and civil society must work together to ensure that prosperity is shared across all communities. The oil economy is a transformative force—but its benefits will only be fully realized if Guyana can navigate the delicate balance between class and ethnic equity.
Follow the GBJ’s ongoing commentary, and become a Sustaining Member for just $5.00/month. | Donate Here
