Guyana’s Developmental Trajectory and the Impact of U.S. Tariffs on Oil

The history of U.S. tariff policies and their influence on global oil prices provides critical insights into how Guyana, as an emerging oil producer, should navigate the evolving geopolitical and economic landscape. From the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 to the Trump and Biden-era tariffs, these economic policies have shaped global oil demand and prices, often with significant consequences for developing nations. Given Guyana’s reliance on oil revenues, understanding these historical precedents is essential to formulating a strategic response to current and future U.S. trade policies.

The Great Depression era Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, enacted in 1930, significantly increased tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods in an effort to protect American industries. However, this led to retaliatory tariffs from major U.S. trading partners, triggering a collapse in global trade. The ensuing economic contraction drastically reduced industrial production, including demand for oil, causing a sharp decline in oil prices. This serves as a stark reminder that protectionist measures can have unintended global consequences, particularly for resource-dependent economies.

Similarly, President Richard Nixon’s tariffs in the early 1970s were aimed at addressing domestic economic challenges, including inflation and a weakening U.S. dollar. However, these measures led to a depreciation of the dollar, prompting OPEC to raise oil prices to compensate for their reduced purchasing power. This action, combined with broader geopolitical tensions, resulted in the 1973 OPEC oil embargo, during which oil prices quadrupled from $3 per barrel to $12 per barrel. The sudden surge in oil prices sent shockwaves across global markets, disrupting economies dependent on oil imports and leading to widespread inflation and economic instability.

During the early 1980s, President Ronald Reagan imposed tariffs on imported steel and other industrial goods to protect U.S. manufacturers from foreign competition. These policies, combined with increased global oil production from OPEC and new discoveries in the North Sea, contributed to an oil supply glut. As a result, oil prices collapsed from $35 per barrel in 1980 to approximately $10 per barrel by 1986. This period underscores the vulnerability of oil-exporting nations to global supply fluctuations and economic protectionism in large economies like the United States.

More recently, President Donald Trump’s trade war against China, initiated in 2018, included a series of escalating tariffs on Chinese imports. The resulting trade tensions slowed global economic growth, reducing demand for oil and leading to a sharp drop in oil prices. Brent crude, for example, fell from $85 per barrel in October 2018 to around $50 per barrel by early 2019. The prolonged uncertainty surrounding U.S.-China trade relations created significant volatility in oil markets, which was further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

President Joe Biden has maintained some of Trump’s tariffs while also introducing new tariffs on China’s green energy sector in 2024. These policies have contributed to continued trade tensions, supply chain disruptions, and concerns over a potential global economic slowdown. As a result, oil prices have remained volatile, influenced by geopolitical factors such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and broader inflationary pressures.

For Guyana, these historical cases offer important lessons. The country has recently positioned itself as a major player in the global oil market, with significant offshore reserves and growing production. However, it must recognize the risks posed by external factors, such as U.S. tariffs, that can lead to demand contraction and price instability. A trade war between the U.S. and China or further tariffs on industrial goods could slow global economic activity, weakening oil demand and reducing revenue expectations for Guyana. Conversely, tariffs that devalue the U.S. dollar could push oil prices higher, benefiting Guyana in the short term but potentially leading to market corrections later.

In light of these realities, Guyana’s posture should be proactive and adaptive. First, the country must diversify its economy beyond oil to buffer against price volatility. While petroleum remains a cornerstone of economic growth, investments in infrastructure, renewable energy, and manufacturing can provide stability. Second, Guyana must strengthen diplomatic ties with both the U.S. and China to ensure that its energy market remains resilient amid trade disputes. Finally, the Guyanese leadership must leverage its oil revenues to ensure that our sovereign wealth mechanisms can sustain economic stability in times of global uncertainty.

Guyana must remain vigilant as the Trump administration considers new tariff policies that could disrupt global trade and energy markets. Learning from history, the nation should position itself strategically to mitigate risks associated with global economic fluctuations, ensuring long-term prosperity and stability.

The Guyana Business Journal is committed to fostering discussions on Guyana’s economic future. We welcome your thoughts on the pathways to sustainable development.  Please support the Guyana Business Journal and Magazine.